|
TASTEMAKERS? WHY?
As a designer, I have to be aware of what is happening in the design
and décor world. This time of year, we get lists. We get
lists of what's hot and what's not, and lists of those who purportedly
have contributed significantly in the past year. After reviewing
some of these year-end summations, I found myself just shaking my
head with my mouth agape!
I recently read the January issue of a popular design magazine;
it was devoted to current "Tastemakers," hence the title
of this month's column. As I browsed the issue, I saw some nice
designs. By "nice," I mean functional, timeless, comfortable,
accessible (=affordable) designs. So far, so good.
But I also saw things that made no sense. When evaluating designs
(or anything else), I commonly ask, "Why?" I've said this
before, and I'll keep repeating it until you also make "why"
a significant part of your vocabulary.
For instance, there was a lot of pomp and circumstance. Don't we
have enough of this in our everyday lives? Why do we need pomp and
circumstance in our homes? Steer horns on the otherwise barren mantle?
An ottoman as display shelf? Items chosen for their cost rather
than their esthetics? Someone who wanted to return to the (IMHO)
potentially gaudy "Baroque revival"? Why?
There were several tastemakers who did landscaping, and they did
it well. But the feature included no educational information, and
their interesting ideas are not that easy to execute (as a biologist,
I know). Maybe I'm too oriented toward education, but I feel cheated
if I'm only shown pretty pictures without being educated. Do you?
Why not? And what about the landscaper who felt uncomfortable "with
the wilds of nature"? What is that about? I had to read the
paragraph three times to make sure I wasn't skipping an crucial
word or two. Sounds like the type of person who gives landscapers
a bad name. Why would such a person be a tastemaker?
Then there is celebrity (self-proclaimed and otherwise). What are
these people's credentials? Family names? I don't care. Association
with expensive fashion houses? I don't care about that either. People
who are able to use $1million to decorate a single room? I REALLY
don't care about that. Do you? If so, why?
What about innovation? What about providing sound psychological
evidence for décor rather than gestalt improvisation? What
about placing function ahead of form, so that design and décor
make sense rather than causing people to shake their heads? These
are all questions that I asked (and answered with data) when I first
decided to offer my design services to others.
Of course, even in those early days I realized I would have to
deal with the "what's hot, what's not" lists, and I have
written about these in other columns, such as my essay on trends
at Senses of Living - September 2004.
Having just been confronted with such a list from the Chicago Tribune,
I HAD to make a statement. I could just stop with "Why?"
or maybe just "Ick," but I won't.
I have now learned that it is "hot" (perhaps literally)
to have a ceiling-mounted and ceiling-vented fireplace called "The
Fireorb." Yes, this fireplace is quite eye-catching, and would
be stylish and appropriate in the "right" room. I tremble
to think of the people who will feel obligated to purchase The Fireorb
for their traditionally-decorated homes because it is "hot."
Maybe you want a Fireorb, and think a new paint job will make your
room more consistent with the futuristic fireplace? Well, I am told
that it is "hot" to select paint colors with food names.
Unfortunately, I found problems with this (surely, you aren't surprised!).
Most of these food colors are not new shades or tones; they have
just been renamed. And, their color "cheddar cheese" is
a bilious orange, and we all know that the orange coloring in mass-produced
cheddars comes from dyes (usually from annatto seeds); natural cheddar
is a warm creamy color, so their food names are promoting "unnatural"
foods.
Amid the vast array of "What's Hot, What's Not," I did
find one citation that warmed my heart (I'm not being sarcastic,
either). Right there, among the mundane recommendations for fashionable
living, was the simple statement: "HOT: Defining Patriotism
for Yourself." This self-empowering encouragement can be applied
to any aspect of life or décor. Somehow, though, it seems
inconsistent that this praise for individuality should be hidden
within pages of "group think" promotion. It's a hidden
gem that I'm now sharing with you.
Here's another gem I'll share: These lists are about laughter!
Any décor scheme looks better with laughter, and that's what
these lists make me do! I have no idea whether I'm laughing WITH
the authors of these lists, laughing AT them, or a little of both,
but I am definitely laughing.
And with that laughter, I am reminded that, in the grand scheme
of things, décor just isn't that important. Yes, I have long
argued and demonstrated that we can improve our lives using décor,
and THAT is important. Anything that improves our lives, the lives
of those around us, and the world in general is important. But investing
any energy in learning about "hot and not" lists, or "in
and out" lists, or trends or tastemakers is just unnecessary.
Enhancing your own lives is important. Defining patriotism for
yourself is important. Laughing is important. Becoming your own
tastemaker is important.
Isn't this a great way to start 2005? Emphasizing what is important
and ignoring that which isn't important. It's prioritization, and
it's something I help people do with their home décor, and
with all aspects of their lives. If you want to report your success
with prioritizing, or need some assistance, call me at 773.508.9208
or email me at bret@god-dess.com.
I think it's important to hear from you! We can laugh together!
|